CFP: Neo-Victorian Biofiction: Re-Imagining Nineteenth-Century Historical Subjects

CFP: Neo-Victorian Biofiction: Re-Imagining Nineteenth-Century Historical Subjects

We invite contributions on Neo-Victorian Biofiction for our last volume in Rodopi’s Neo-Victorian Series to be published in 2016. This edited collection will examine the manifold narrative ethics and strategies employed by writers, dramatists, poets, filmmakers, graphic novelists and other artists to re-imagine the lives of nineteenth-century historical subjects. From celebrities, including iconic public figures and notorious criminals, to obscure individuals virtually erased from historical records, as in the case of slaves, servants, industrial and sex workers, the personal triumphs and traumas of real-life
people of the period continue to exert an evident fascination for the present.

On one hand, neo-Victorian biofiction’s prosopopoeic ‘resurrectionism’ seeks to write/right the wrongs of history, to shed new light on the dark sides of the Victorian archive and, ultimately, to perform an ethics of truth and testimony. On the other hand, it involves ethical risks of appropriation for present-day agendas, symbolic (re-)victimisation, factual distortion, and even defamation.
How do ‘biofictioneers’ negotiate these risks so as to do justice and bear after-witness to the actual lives lived? To what extent do artists
self-consciously foreground, question and reconsider the historiographic metafictional slippage between fact and fiction in their works? And is it legitimate to ‘invent’ compensatory or alternative histories? Indeed, can texts heavily reliant on fabulation still be regarded as biofiction per se? As well as proposals on the usual suspects, such as Queen Victorian and the great Victorian
writers of Dickens, Wilde & Co., we are particularly interested in chapter proposals on biofictions of the following:
artists and models; Australian Aborigines; children; doctors; indigenous actors in the India’s ‘First War of Independence’; maids and menservants; mistresses and prostitutes; poets and poets’ muses; travelers and explorers. Possible topics may include, but need not be limited to the following:
• biofiction’s shaping role in contemporary views of ‘the Victorian’
• the relationship between biofiction and postmodernism
• the politics of prosopopoeia (voice/voicing, single vs. multiple points of
view, third-person biofiction vs. first-person ‘autobiofiction’, etc.)
• techniques producing empathy and/or distancing effects
• the ideological (feminist, postcolonial, queer, etc.) agendas of biofiction
• the un/ethics of biofictional practice
• biofiction in the context of adaptation studies
• the gender politics of biofiction
• spectrality and/or biofictional ‘grave robbing’
• the ontological slippages between fact and fiction, history and story
• the uses of comedy in biofictional texts
• differences in biofiction across neo-Victorian genres and media
• biofiction as after-witness to nineteenth-century traumas

Please send 300-500 word proposals (for 8,000-10,000 word chapters) to the series editors: Marie-Luise Kohlke at m.l.kohlke@swansea.ac.uk and Christian Gutleben at Christian.GUTLEBEN@unice.fr by 28 February 2015. Please add a short biographical note in the body of your email. Completed chapters will be due by 1 September 2015.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Calls for papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s